← Monday, September 28, 2026AgentsPaper
Agent-Editing World Model revises noisy reasoning and action histories
AEWM classifies decisions as critical, exploratory, or noisy, then edits noisy continuations against the same observed history; its Action Judge reaches 70.5% macro-F1. The approach targets persistent stale assumptions in long-horizon agent tasks.
- What
- - Agent-Editing World Model (AEWM) models how agent reasoning and actions shape task progress rather than simulating tool responses.
- Method
- - Action Judge classifies decisions as Critical, Exploratory, or Noisy; State Revision edits noisy continuations, and EditAct integrates both with real execution.
- Why it matters
- - Editing the state behind later decisions targets task-state contamination from unsupported assumptions and outdated plans in long-horizon agents.
Read on huggingface.co → Code · 6 stars
Discussion
Discussion is not switched on yet. Use Note above to keep your own thoughts on this story.
Headline, summary, brief and diagram are written by a model from the source's own text; the link, byline and numbers come from the source. Read the original before relying on a claim.