← Thursday, October 1, 2026ArchitectureCase study
Tigris moves async task queues from FoundationDB to Kafka
Tigris kept queues in FoundationDB to preserve transactional writes, but task scheduling and completion added reads and writes that competed with user requests. The trade-offs show when a custom database-backed queue may stop scaling well for a growing product.
- What
- Tigris moved some asynchronous tasks, including garbage collection, from FoundationDB queues to Kafka while retaining queues in FoundationDB.
- How
- Using FoundationDB as a queue required scheduling writes and scans that competed with user requests, plus multiple writes per task.
- Why it matters
- Moving those tasks to Kafka reduces FoundationDB read and write load and cuts custom queue code.
Read on tigrisdata.com → Lobsters · 9 comments
Discussion
Discussion is not switched on yet. Use Note above to keep your own thoughts on this story.
Headline, summary, brief and diagram are written by a model from the source's own text; the link, byline and numbers come from the source. Read the original before relying on a claim.