← Sunday, October 4, 2026DatabasesBenchmark
Postgres 19 REPACK CONCURRENTLY was fastest in an online rewrite comparison
A measurement comparing Postgres 19’s REPACK CONCURRENTLY with pg_repack and pg_squeeze found REPACK fastest, while noting trade-offs. The results can inform online table-rewrite choices, though the excerpt does not detail the downsides.
- What
- Postgres 19’s REPACK CONCURRENTLY was compared with pg_repack and pg_squeeze for online table rewriting.
- How
- REPACK was fastest in the tests, but a bug that could lose updates was fixed and testing found a hard limit on concurrent changes it can absorb.
- Why it matters
- Engineers evaluating online table maintenance need to weigh rewrite speed against concurrency limits and update-safety concerns.
Discussion
Discussion is not switched on yet. Use Note above to keep your own thoughts on this story.
Headline, summary, brief and diagram are written by a model from the source's own text; the link, byline and numbers come from the source. Read the original before relying on a claim.