← Tuesday, October 6, 2026AgentsPaper

OSWorld-Pro evaluates computer-use agents across subgoals and action failures

huggingface.co by Zhilin Wang et al. Editor score 9/10

OSWorld-Pro provides over 300 tasks, 2,800 subgoals, and 67,000 human annotations; its top model scores 75.7% versus 83.4% on OSWorld. Process-level evaluation can expose whether agents fail on inputs, clicks, or other steps rather than only judging final deliverables.

What
OSWorld-Pro evaluates computer-use agents through over 2,800 subgoals across more than 300 tasks.
Method
Human annotations ground LLM judges that score subgoal fulfillment, exposing progress and process-level failures such as irrelevant actions and click mistakes.
Why it matters
Engineers can use its subgoal-level failure signals to target improvements instead of relying only on final task outcomes.
contain fulfillment ground evalua… tasks humanannotations subgoals LLM-Judges
Tasks are broken into subgoals that judges assess using human annotations. Sketched from the article's own text.

Discussion

Discussion is not switched on yet. Use Note above to keep your own thoughts on this story.

Headline, summary, brief and diagram are written by a model from the source's own text; the link, byline and numbers come from the source. Read the original before relying on a claim.

Your note

Private to you. Stored in this browser, and synced to your account when you are signed in.