← Sunday, October 11, 2026Languages & toolsDeep dive
Four theorem provers compared across proof discovery and manipulation
The comparison covers Lean, Isabelle/HOL, HOL4, and Agda, including proof discovery, manipulation, and the author’s rankings. Engineers choosing or studying formal verification tools get a practical, if explicitly opinionated, perspective.
- What
- Lean, Isabelle/HOL, HOL4 and Agda are theorem provers for computer-formalizing mathematics.
- How
- Lean and Agda use dependent types; Isabelle/HOL and HOL4 use LCF-style kernels. The review formalizes Euclid’s proof of infinitely many primes in all four.
- Why it matters
- These contrasts help engineers choose proof tooling based on foundations, interactivity and automation.
Read on blueberrywren.dev → Lobsters · 20 comments
Discussion
Discussion is not switched on yet. Use Note above to keep your own thoughts on this story.
Headline, summary, brief and diagram are written by a model from the source's own text; the link, byline and numbers come from the source. Read the original before relying on a claim.